RESUMO
Purpose@#Ankle pump exercises (APE) have been widely used in clinical practice. However, best practices for APE have not been established. Recognize the most effective frequency of APE for improving lower extremity hemodynamics and establish recommendations in clinical practice. @*Methods@#Therefore, a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed according to PRISMA-NMA. Six English databases (Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane library and ProQuest) and four Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and Sinomed) were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies investigating the effects of different frequencies of APE on lower limb hemodynamics published before July 2022 were included. The reference list was also searched. Seven studies (one RCTs and six quasi-experimental studies) were included in the systematic review and five studies (one RCTs and four quasi-experimental studies) were included in the NMA. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The NMA was performed using the R software (version 4.2.1) and OpenBUGS (version 3.2.3). @*Results@#The results of the NMA showed that a frequency of every 3–4 s the most effective in improving lower extremity hemodynamics (P =.85), followed by every 1–2 s (P = .81), every 5–6 s (P=.32) and less than every 10 s (P =.02). Subgroup analysis failed to find a difference between healthy participants and those with unilateral total hip arthroplasty or fracture (MD = −0.23, 95% CI-5.92 to 4.61). @*Conclusions@#Consequencely, for adult patients, with or without lower extremity disease, a frequency of every 3–4 s can be recommended as the optimal frequency of APE in clinical care practice.Registered number on PROSPEROCRD42022349365. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=349365.
RESUMO
Objective:To understand the views and suggestions of medical staff on the key nursing techniques and norms of in-hospital treatment of patients with nuclear exposure, so as to provide reference for the continuous optimization of follow-up processes.Methods:From September to October 2021,purpose sampling was adopted to select doctors and nurses who engaged in medical emergency rescue of nuclear exposure-related work in two divisions of the Nuclear Accident Medical Emergency Center of the National Health Commission as the research subjects, using a combination of online and offline methods to carry out semi-structured interviews with 6 research subjects,using content analysis methods in descriptive research for data analysis.Results:A total of four themes were refined including the need for the establishment of nursing technology and process specification for nuclear accident emergency rescue specialty; the need for specialized training of nursing technology in nuclear accident emergency rescue; the need for the construction of specialized nursing team for nuclear accident emergency rescue; the need to strengthen the closeness of multi-team cooperation.Conclusions:The current in-hospital care technology and processes for nuclear exposed patients need to be further refined and standardized, and in the future, we need to establish a perfect in-hospital care technology and processes for nuclear exposed patients, and according to the corresponding technology and processes, strengthen nursing staff professional training and simulation training in nuclear accident emergency rescue, and establish a nuclear emergency rescue professional nursing team to promote the development of nuclear accident emergency rescue nursing specialists.